I picked up a 50ct. box of one hundred sixty Nosler Accubonds, but I am hesitant to burn up the powder and projectiles on workup when all I have is fifty bullets. But I actually need to find a bullet within the a hundred and sixty class that my older rifle likes.

I gave up on it and went to other powder in the event the new powder was acquiring far more strain and was slower as opposed to old things. I do not keep in mind if I even tried out common h4831 or not; I'm pondering not. Click to develop...

The truth that the H4831 is indeed a slower burning powder is specifically why you are seeing bigger velocities received with that powder, instead of Whatever you've seen While using the IMR stuff. Also very good powder, but relatively improved suited to a bit scaled-down instances which has a bit fewer capability.

Run your load up with the precise powder (sc or normal) and large amount you might be employing although. Identical burn off amount doesn't mean it will behave "precisely" the identical. I've found over 100 fps distinction between sc and mil-surp a great deal of H4831.

Yup or it will not operate perfectly. And since the OP includes a load working with Varget I might try to discover an individual to trade with. Could possibly think of a gain gain situation.

Since there isn't going to appear to be any "official" Load Data around for this Load, can many of you present a starting point with this mix and points to consider when working this Load up?

I'm employing it with a 210 Berger. In my rifle, H1000 wasn't as exact. RL22 did effectively but I was somewhat worried about temp stability. I believe I am at seventy two grains and have about 2850ish fps

If you've some heavier .224" bullets, you could possibly find a load that actually works Alright Together with the 4831. The bullets I attempted which were more than 70 grains would not stabilize in my rifle, which experienced the regular fourteen" twist. The 70-grain Speer was the biggest bullet that could stabilize, but it did that fantastically. It is a funny-hunting bullet which has a rounded nose profile, nevertheless it shoots terrific and kills nicely. Deer out to about 150 yards al went down straight away with rib-cage hits.

The primary reason h4831sc I switched from IMR 4831 to H4831 was to take advantage of the temperature insensitivity of the Hodgdon Extraordinary powder.

In addition it goes on to state that due to the fshorter grains, that load density may very well be a little bit greater.

I've experienced comparable knowledge with H4350. For me, some ball powders won't shoot properly with anything besides Fed215's. Some parts just Will not Participate in nicely with other. Appears like you have picked out 3 excellent powders, I might hope a minimum of one of them to shoot.

The "SC" means Brief Slash. I have not recognized a distinction between both powder dut I don't Feel I'd mix them.

I understand the H4831SC gives a greater load density But I think I've more than enough place in h4831sc my scenario for the conventional H4831.

The truth that the H4831 is without a doubt a slower burning powder is specifically why you might be looking at higher velocities received with that powder, h4831 vs h4831sc in contrast to Anything you've noticed With all the IMR stuff.